Recent reports reveal an ongoing investigation by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the Ethereum Foundation, speculating it to be a targeted campaign. The SEC has issued subpoenas to various entities associated with the Foundation. This scrutiny is believed to underscore reasons to postpone or dismiss the approval of Ethereum-based exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Industry observers have noted a considerable shift in the SEC’s engagement with Ethereum, which may have a significant impact on the cryptocurrency’s regulatory future.
Subpoenas and Securities Debate
The SEC is reported to have initiated efforts in 2022 aimed at classifying Ethereum as a security, a stance that contradicts previous perceptions of the digital currency. In defense of Ethereum’s established classification, Paul Grewal, Coinbase‘s Chief Legal Officer, highlights past congressional testimonies by SEC Chairman Gary Gensler that did not consider Ethereum a security. Investment experts such as Travis Kling of Ikigai Asset Management view these investigative moves as a deliberate offensive against Ethereum, potentially affecting its market prospects.
Implications for Ethereum ETFs and Regulatory Consensus
Amid the investigation, Bloomberg ETF specialists have significantly lowered the probability of an Ethereum spot ETF gaining approval by May. This downward revision is attributed to the SEC’s apparent hesitance to engage with ETF proposers. Politicians, such as Patrick McHenry, the House Financial Services Committee Chairman, have criticized the SEC’s recent actions as contradictory to its prior decisions regarding Ethereum.
On the regulatory front, Brian Quintenz, a former Commodity Futures Trading Commission member, argued that the SEC’s earlier approval of Ethereum futures ETFs implicitly acknowledged Ethereum’s status outside the realm of security. However, some, like Charles Hoskinson of Cardano, suggest that the SEC’s perspective might have shifted post-Ethereum’s move to a proof-of-stake mechanism. Quintenz refutes this, indicating that the SEC would have factored in such changes during its decision-making process on Ethereum futures ETFs.
The debate centers around the implications of labeling Ethereum as a security, which would impact existing derivatives and raise questions regarding their legal standing under current regulations. The outcome of this investigation could redefine the regulatory landscape for Ethereum and similar digital assets.
